|
|
|
Click Here for
Click Here
for
Barack Obama: The Naked Emperor
By David Icke
WWW.DAVIDICKE.COM/OBAMA (Original Article)
I am writing
this in the last days of 2008 as I watch with dismay as vast numbers of people
across the world, including many who should know better, have been duped by the
mind-game called Operation Obama.
Even people
with some understanding of the conspiracy have said things like: 'Well, at
least he's not Bush' and 'Well, at least it's great to see such a new spirit of
hope'. No, he's not Bush - he's potentially far more dangerous; and what is the
use of a spirit of 'hope' if it's based on a lie? In fact, what use is 'hope'
at all?
Obama's
wife, Michelle, who I wouldn't trust to tell me the date in a calendar factory,
said that 'everything begins and ends with hope'. Utter nonsense. Hope is a
meaningless emotion because its fruits are always in the future and, by
definition, never in the NOW.
Hope is like
riding a carousel horse; no matter how fast you go you never get closer to the
one in front. The idea, however, is to persuade you to stay on the horse,
despite the evitable disappointment, in the 'hope' that things will change. But
they don't because the very system is designed to prevent it.
That's the
way 'hope' is employed by the dastardly and devious - take the crap we are
giving you now in the 'hope' that things will get better (but we know they
won't). Barack Obama is a purveyor of 'hope' because his masters want the
people to accept what they are given now in the hope that good times will come.
Just do what
we demand, oops, sorry, Barack demands, and in return he'll inspire you to hope
that it is all leading to the Promised Land. It isn't, but, by the time you
realise that, it's too late.
What
terrifies the manipulators is that people will abandon hope, as a future,
sometime-never projection, and start to demand fairness, justice and freedom
now. To avoid this nightmare they need to keep those desires as something to
aspire to, not to actually have.
Thus, their
man, Obama, sells 'hope' as a diversion technique, a holding position, to keep
the masses from truly rebelling. We have no job, no food on the table and our
home has been foreclosed, but at least we have 'hope'. Phew, thank goodness for
that.
'I'm hungry,
mum, can I have some hope, please?'
'I'm so sorry, darling, you can't have hope
today, only tomorrow - hope is always tomorrow.'
'So will I
eat tomorrow, mum?'
'We can hope
so now, dear, but when we get to tomorrow, we can only hope it's the next day.'
On and on it
goes. That's how 'hope' works. Or rather doesn't.
Obama's
predominant mantra has been 'change'. Indeed, his massively-funded,
record-breaking campaign was based on that one word - change. This is a
technique used by Bill Clinton and many others and it is highly effective
because, at any point, the system ensures that most people are not happy with
the way life is. So, when you don't like the status quo, 'change' can be a
potent message, even if, like Obama, you don't say what it means.
It has been
vital to his success, and that of his controllers, that he has never specified
what his 'hope', 'change', and that other mind-control trigger-word, 'believe',
were referring to in terms of policy and the way society in general will be
affected. Hope for what? Change what? Believe in what? To answer those
questions with specifics would have been fatal to Obama's appeal.
I studied
the military/government mind-control programmes and techniques in great detail
for many years during the late-1990s and across 2000, and the Obama
'phenomenon' is the most blatant mass-mind control operation you could wish to
see.
At its core
the plan has been to make Obama the focus of everything you hope for, believe
in and want to change. This is why it has been crucial for him not to specify
and detail what is meant by his 'hope, 'change' and 'believe'.
However, I
can tell you what those words mean in the context of the Obama mind-game. They
mean whatever you decide they mean or want them to mean. The idea is for you to
project all that you stand for onto him and so he becomes the symbol of you and
how you see the world. Specifics would destroy that 'I am whatever you want me
to be' scenario and so you don't get any detail, just 'hope', 'change', and
'believe'.
They don't
want him to be seen only as 'the Messiah'; they also want him to be Abraham
Lincoln, JFK, or Buddha - anyone you choose to project on him, for he is a
blank page, blank screen and empty suit. Obama is a make-your-own,
do-it-yourself leader, a projection of your own mind. (If you are still asleep,
that is. If you are in any way awake, he's an open book.)
'I am
whatever you want me to be, for I am just a projection of you. And I got a big
smile, see.'
There is no
more powerful way of manipulating people than to tell them what they want to
hear and to keep shtum about anything they wouldn't like. Double-glazing
salesmen are trained to pick up in general conversation what their target likes
and dislikes and to respond accordingly in the way the product is sold. The
technique is simply to tell the potential buyer what you have gleaned they want
to be told.
Obama comes
from the same stable, but on a massively bigger scale and with a whole network
of advisors and controllers steeped in the art of manipulating minds, opinions
and actions.
Obama's
written-for-him speeches are not from the heart, but from the autocue. The
'heart' bit comes from extensive training and his Bill Clintonesque ability to
'mean it when he says it', a state of delivery that goes beyond mere acting.
Tony Blair was trained in the same way.
But if you
take a step back and look at these people dispassionately you can clearly see
the techniques they consciously employ. Blair is the most blatant fraud in the
way he delivers a line, stops in mid-sentence for emphasis and looks down for
fake emotional effect. Obama is a little more slick, but, from where I have
been looking this past year, not much. And how have people not seen those cold
eyes just above the painted smile?
You can
watch his mind working, turning between autocue screens to his left and right,
then straight down the camera for his key messages. From-the-heart orators
don't do that; they are too immersed in what they are feeling and saying to give
even a passing thought to where they are looking or how the line is delivered.
I worked in
television for more than a decade, often reading autocue while a director spoke
in my ear telling me what cameras to look at. I have, since the early 1990s,
spoken my truth on public stages across the world. I know, therefore, the
difference between artificial autocue delivery and body language and talking
from the heart without a script. Obama, I repeat, is coming from the autocue,
not the heart.
Obama's
speeches are a mass of mind-control techniques and
Neuro-Linguistic-Programming, or NLP, and they are carefully constructed to
implant beliefs and perceptions into the mind of the viewer.
As I keep
emphasising, the whole Obama circus is an exercise in mass mind control and it
has been so successful because so many people live their lives in a permanent
state of trance. All of which brings me to the parallels with Nazi Germany,
fascist
Obama may
not look like Hitler, nor sound like Hitler, but the themes are just the same.
From amid
the chaos came the man that Germans saw then in much the same way that so many
see Obama today. His name was Adolf Hitler and his oratory and rhetoric, again
supported by a ritualistic presentation founded on mind-control techniques,
made him appear to be the German 'messiah', the German Obama.
Hitler
promised 'change', 'hope' and something to 'believe in' amidst the consequences
of war and financial collapse. He spoke to vast rallies of adoring followers and
a mass movement emerged in support of Hitler's vision of a new tomorrow.
As the
writer Webster Tarpley points out, fascism in its true sense is not just a
Police State imposed by a tiny hierarchy. It might end up like that, but first
it is brought to power by a mass movement from within the people who have no
understanding of what the 'change', hope' and 'believe' they are being offered
really means. They just know that they want some because, as with Obama, they
make it mean what they want it to mean. Only later do they see, to their
horror, what they have signed up for.
Obama's
... Hitler's
Germany.
There may
seem to be a world of difference, but the techniques are just the same.
Obama is far
more dangerous than Bush because he can sell a line to those who are in the
trance while Boy Bush could not do that on anything like the same scale. Bush
was a transparent idiot with no communication skills who needed massive fraud
at the polls to get him officially 'elected'. He could never be the figurehead
to inspire a mass movement of the people to support some vacuous 'hope',
'change' and 'believe' when they don't even know what those words are supposed
to mean.
But Obama
clearly can, because he has.
One of 'his'
(his controllers') prime targets are the young, just as they were with the
Nazis and the Hitler Youth Movement
In line with
this theme, the WorldNetDaily website reported:
'The
official website of President-Elect Barack Obama, Change.gov, originally
announced that Obama would "require" all middle school through
college students to participate in community service programs; but after a
flurry of blogs protested children being drafted into Obama's proposed youth
corps, the website's wording was softened.
Originally,
under the tab "America Serves", Change.gov read,
"President-Elect Obama will expand national service programs like
AmeriCorps and Peace Corps and will create a new Classroom Corps to help
teachers in under served schools, as well as a new Health Corps, Clean Energy
Corps, and Veterans Corps.
"Obama
will call on citizens of all ages to serve America, by developing a plan to
require 50 hours of community service in middle school and high school and 100
hours of community service in college every year," the site announced.'
Obama said
in a speech in July 2008 in
'If we're
going to create some kind of national police force as big, powerful and well
funded as our combined U.S. military forces, isn't this rather a big deal? I
thought Democrats generally believed the
How is it
possible their candidate is seeking to create some kind of massive but secret
national police force that will be even bigger than the Army, Navy, Marines and
Air Force put together? Is Obama serious about creating some kind of domestic
security force bigger and more expensive than that? If not, why did he say it?
What did he mean?'
Obama meant,
amid the flowery words, that he's not in favour of either peace or freedom. He
is a front-man demagogue for the same force that controlled Boy Bush, Clinton,
Father Bush, Reagan, Carter, ad infinitum; but the difference is that he has
been hyped to such hysterical proportions that he will be allowed to get away
with far more than they were, at least until reality dawns on the mass ranks of
his hypnotised supporters. And, clearly, that could take some time.
The cabal
will be anxious to squeeze every minute from Obama's honeymoon period and we
can expect to see events move quickly after his inauguration in January.
When I was a
journalist 30 years ago, I came across a technique that some tabloid newspaper
reporters would use to get someone to speak with them. They would work in pairs
with the first one knocking on the door of some distressed family who didn't
want to talk with the media. He would tell them he was from a newspaper he
didn't really work for and treat them with aggression and contempt to make them
even more upset.
He would
then leave and his colleague would knock on the door, tell them the real
newspaper he was from, and act like Mr. Nice Guy. He would say that he
understood completely how upsetting the other man must have been, but 'if you
will only speak to me exclusively I will make sure that the other man, nor
anyone like him, won't bother you again'. They usually agreed and the scam was
complete.
Much the
same thing is happening with regard to Bush and Obama. The Neoconservative
'Republican' wing of the Illuminati controlled Bush for eight years and led the
country into foreign wars and financial chaos (bad guy/problem); now the
'Democratic' wing, led by the infamous Zbigniew Brzezinski, has brought forth
the 'saviour', Barack Obama, to lead us into the sunshine with 'hope' and
'change' (good guy/solution).
Hence even
some more aware people say: 'At least he's not Bush'.
Apart from
the unspecified 'hope, 'change' and 'believe', few have any idea what Obama's
policies will be. Public perception comes from having an 'image' of him, or a
self-projection, not the fine print because Obama doesn't do fine print until
the votes are cast and even then he will hide it in his windbag words.
There is an
'image' that Obama is against war, but no he's not. He says he's against the
invasion of
Obama isn't
against war at all and, if his controllers have their way, he will engage the
He claims to
be a 'uniter', which is exactly what Bush said about himself before he came to
office, but unity in and of itself is not the issue. Nazi Germany had unity in
the early years of the war, but was that a good thing? What matters is what the
unity is designed to achieve and Obama's much-vaunted 'unity' is to 'inspire' a
mass movement to support the Orwellian plans of the Illuminati.
His constant
rhetoric about 'bringing people together' can be used to justify the 'coming
together' of the United States, Canada and Mexico in the North American Union;
it can be used to concede America's sovereignty to the 'coming together' of the
'world community' (world dictatorship); it can be used to unite the believers
in their opposition and condemnation of non-believers, which is precisely what
happened in Nazi Germany with the book-burning and violent suppression of those
who challenged the Hitler regime.
The
potential of Obama Mania is endless when it comes to selling fascism as 'hope,
change', 'freedom' and a 'New America', or '
Bush and
Cheney were transparent warmongers and would always have struggled to bring in
the draft, the compulsory enlistment of people into the military against their
will. But it would not be as difficult for Obama in the current climate. For
goodness sake, he's already talking about compulsory community service for
middle school, high school and college students and creating a peoples' army in
That's why I
say Obama is far more dangerous to freedom than Bush. In the last eight years
Bush could only get part of the way to fascism - Obama has the potential to
finish the job, for all the reasons I have mentioned and more.
You only
have to look at the cabal behind Obama, and those he has already appointed to
his administration team, to see what his 'change' is truly planned to be. His
mentor, svengali and main controller is Zbigniew Brzezinski, Jimmy Carter's
National Security Advisor, and the co-founder, with David Rockefeller, of the
Illuminati's Trilateral Commission.
Brzezinski
has admitted publicly that he began to fund and train what he would call today
'terrorists' in Afghanistan to oppose the Soviet-controlled government in the
capital, Kabul, in the late 1970s. The idea, he said, was to entice the Soviet
Union to invade
Brzezinski's
'freedom fighters' would become known as the 'Mujahideen' and later the Taliban
and what is claimed to be 'Al-Qaeda'. This is the man behind 'anti-war', Barack
Obama. It was common knowledge that President Carter would do nothing involving
foreign policy without the okay from Brzezinski, the co-founder of the
Trilateral Commission which chose Carter for president.
It is one of
many great ironies of the Obama presidency that he is demanding massive troop
reinforcements to be sent to
But then, in
Brzezinski's case, it is not 'fate', but cold calculation that has brought it
all about. The Poland-born Brzezinski has a fierce hatred of
And if they
are Brzezinski's targets, they are Obama's targets.
The
Trilateral Commission and the wider Brzezinski network, including Illuminati
fronts like the Ford Foundation, have now chosen Obama and the situation will
be the same. Brzezinski will call the shots; Obama's job is simply to sell them
to the people. This is rather alarming when you think that Brzezinski wants to
trigger a war involving
'Needed
social reassessment ... can be encouraged by deliberate civic education that
stresses the notion of service to a higher cause than oneself. As some have
occasionally urged, a major step in that direction would be the adoption of an
obligatory period of national service for every young adult, perhaps involving
a variety of congressionally approved domestic or foreign good works.'
Now where
have I heard that before?
As an
Illuminati operative, Brzezinski's aim is to create a world government, central
bank, currency and army - a global dictatorship - underpinned by a microchipped
population connected to a global computer/satellite system. He wrote a book in
1970, Between Two Ages:
'The
technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society.
Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional
values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over
every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most
personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to
instantaneous retrieval by the authorities.'
He also said
in the same book nearly 40 years ago:
'Today we
are again witnessing the emergence of transnational elites ... [Whose] ties cut
across national boundaries ... It is likely that before long the social elites
of most of the more advanced countries will be highly internationalist or
globalist in spirit and outlook ... The nation-state is gradually yielding its
sovereignty ... Further progress will require greater American sacrifices. More
intensive efforts to shape a new world monetary structure will have to be
undertaken, with some consequent risk to the present relatively favorable
American position.'
And what
does his puppet, Obama, now say that Americans have to do to bring about
'change'? 'Make sacrifices'. As Mrs. Demagogue, Michelle, said:
'We need a
different leadership because our souls are broken. We need to be inspired ...
to make the sacrifices that are needed to push us to a different place.'
You can bet
that this will include sacrificing more sovereignty and freedom on the road to
the global dictatorship described by Brzezinski for decades.
Brzezinski's
son, Mark, was an 'advisor' to the Obama campaign (doing what his father told
him) and, in line with the American one-party-state, his other son, Ian, was
foreign policy advisor to the McCain campaign (doing what his father told him).
His daughter, the Obama-supporting Mika Brzezinski, reported the campaign for
MSNBC television.
Obama has
been the chosen one for a long time, a fact known only to a few in the deep
inner circle, and his relationship with Brzezinski almost certainly goes back
to the start of the 1980s when he attended the Ivy League, and big-time
Illuminati, Columbia University where Brzezinski was head of the Institute for
Communist Affairs. Obama simply will not talk in any detail about this period.
He has been covertly funded and supported ever since by the Trilateral
Commission and its network of foundations connecting into the Ford Foundation,
for whom Obama's mother worked.
And a
question: Does anyone really believe that someone, a 'man of the people', would
simply appear from apparently nowhere to run the slickest and best-funded
presidential campaign in American history? He was chosen long ago by those who
wish to enslave the very people that Obama says he wants to 'set free'.
The sources
of Obama funding read like a Wall Street Who's Who - Goldman Sachs, UBS,
Citigroup, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, J.P. Morgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, and
so on. No wonder he went back on his pledge to accept the limitations of public
funding for his campaign and instead took the no-limit option of 'private'
funding.
And those
people are going to support a candidate who does not represent their best
interests?? Oh please.
Obama and
his seasoned network of professional manipulators, sorry his 'campaign team',
sold the lie that he had refused to take funding from 'lobbyists', those who
are paid to ensure that politicians frame legislation, or block it, in the
interests of their clients.
But like
everything that surrounds Obama, past and present, it's a sleight of hand and
mouth. They funnelled vast sums of money into the Obama accounts through law
firms that represent lobbyists and lobby groups. It provided 'plausible denial'
about funding from lobbyists while the money poured in from lobby interests via
third parties.
Then there
is the Jewish financier, George Soros, the multi-billionaire associate of
Brzezinski and closely involved with the funding and marketing of Obama. Soros
is a former board member of the Illuminati's Council on Foreign Relations and
funds the European Council on Foreign Relations. In short, he is a major
insider.
You can
certainly see the Soros/Brzezinski techniques in the Obama 'revolution' in the
These
manufactured protests were sold to the world as 'peoples' revolutions', but it
just so happened that when they were over and the old regime was removed the
new leaders were those waiting in the wings all along - the puppets of Soros,
Brzezinski and their associated networks.
Obama is
just more of the same, a big smile with strings attached, and controlled
completely by the Illuminati networks that chose him, trained him, sold him and
provided his record funding. It was they who kept his many skeletons under
wraps, like the gay sex and crack cocaine allegations of Larry Sinclair, and
they will continue to do so as long as he jumps to their bidding.
Obama is
just another Banksters' moll prostituting himself for fame and power, and
that's why he supported the grotesque bail-out of the banking system and why he
will always put their interests before the people. His financial advisors are
straight from the Wall Street 'A' list, including Paul Adolph Volker
(Trilateral Commission, Council on Foreign Relations, Bilderberg Group), the
head of the Federal Reserve from 1979 to 1987 and Illuminati to his fingertips.
Obama has
made him head of the Economic Recovery Advisory Board, which is dominated by
insiders, including its staff director and chief economist, Austan Goolsbee, a
close Obama associate from the
Another Wall
Street insider, the Zionist Timothy Geithner (Bilderberg Group, Trilateral
Commission, Council on Foreign Relations), was appointed by Obama to be his
Treasury Secretary. Geithner was the President of the New York Federal Reserve
Bank, the most powerful in the private 'Federal' Reserve cartel that
masquerades as
Obama's
Treasury team locks into the inner circle around the Zionist Robert Rubin, the
Director and Senior Counselor of Citigroup, co-chairman of the Council on
Foreign Relations, and economic advisor to Obama. Rubin, a member of the
Illuminati Bilderberg Group, was the man behind Citigroup's strategy of
expanding its risk in debt markets which forced it to be rescued by taxpayers'
money.
The very
people who caused the financial crisis are being appointed by Obama to decide
how to respond to it (more taxpayers' money for them and their friends).
Rubin was
Treasury Secretary to Bill Clinton and was followed in that post by Larry
Summers (Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commission, Council on Foreign Relations)
- another insider appointed to Obama's team of 'change'. Summers is a fanatical
supporter of 'free trade' (freedom to exploit) and 'globalisation' (global
dictatorship) and he wrote a memo in 1991, while chief economist to the World
Bank, saying that the bank should dump toxic waste in poor countries because
the costs of the ensuing ill-health and death would be lower. When the memo was
made public,
'Your
reasoning is perfectly logical but totally insane ... Your thoughts [provide] a
concrete example of the unbelievable alienation, reductionist thinking, social
ruthlessness and the arrogant ignorance of many conventional 'economists'
concerning the nature of the world we live in ... If the World Bank keeps you
as vice president it will lose all credibility. To me it would confirm what I
often said ...the best thing that could happen would be for the Bank to disappear.'
Lutzenburger
was dismissed shortly after writing this letter while the horrific Summers was
made US Treasury Secretary by Bill Clinton and now he has been appointed to
head the National Economic Council by Mr. 'change', hope' and 'believe' Obama.
It's all a fairy story.
Bloomberg.com
reported that the Center for American Progress (CAP), housed just three blocks
from the White House, has become a major source for policy initiatives for the
Obama Democratic Party. Who funds the Center for American Progress? George
Soros.
It is simply
the Neocon Project for the New American Century and the American Enterprise
Institute under another name. Those two organisations developed and dictated
the Bush policy of war and suppression of freedom and the 'CAP' and others like
it will do the same for Obama. The CAP will fit and Obama will wear it.
In fact,
except in name and rhetoric, there is no difference in theme between the
regimes of Bush and Obama. Bush policy was dictated through Illuminati 'think
tanks' and so is Obama's.
Bush was
surrounded by slavish pursuers of Israeli interests and so is Obama. Mr.
'Change' has pledged his unquestioning support for
Obama has
appointed the arch Zionist Rahm Emanuel as his chief of staff and another super
Zionist Jew, Dennis Ross, to be his Middle East Policy advisor. God help the
Palestinians. Ross also served in the Bill Clinton and Father George Bush
administrations. Oh, plenty of 'change' there, then.
Rahm
Emanuel, a Chicago-born Congressman, is the son of Benjamin M. Emanuel, who was
a member of the murderous Jewish terrorist organisation, Irgun, which helped to
bomb and terrorise
Emanuel was
also appointed by Bill Clinton to the board of the mortgage giant Freddie Mac
in 2000 and his tenure coincided with a stream of scandals and financial
irregularities. It famously had to be bailed out by the taxpayer amid the
sub-prime mortgage debacle.
Emanuel,
like Obama himself, is an asset of the 'Illinois Combine', a cross-party
network of politicians and business interests that conspires to manipulate
In December
2008 Blagojevich, the Illinois governor and associate of Obama, was arrested
over a conspiracy involving massive corruption and moves to sell Obama's Senate
seat in Chicago made vacant by his election to the presidency. It is yet
another example of the staggering web on ongoing and infamous corruption in
A close
friend of Rahm Emanuel is another clone of the Illinois Combine, the Zionist,
David Axelrod, who ran Obama's election campaign and will no doubt be highly
influential in the Obama administration. Axelrod is a veteran of
Bill Clinton
took his
All of this
may be many things, none of them pleasant, but 'change' it isn't.
David
Axelrod, Obama's 'narrator' and handler.
Obama is a
monumental fraud who talks a good story, but lives a very different one. He won
his first political office as a state senator in
Instead of
running against his opponents and letting the people decide, he had his cronies
challenge hundreds of names on the nomination papers of his Democratic primary
rivals until they were all forced off the ballot by technicalities. He then ran
unopposed. One of them, Gha-is Askia, says that Obama's behaviour belied his
image as a champion of the little guy and crusader for voter rights:
'Why say
you're for a new tomorrow, then do old-style
Why? Because
he would probably have lost and Obama isn't interested in losing by playing
fair. He wants to win by any means necessary. The only voter-right he's
interested in is the right to vote for him. He has also used his hatchet-men
like Axelrod to employ scandal to discredit opponents to ensure his election
when the real scandal is the truth about Obama himself.
He is a
classically corrupt main-chancer spawned from the
Rezko, yet
another snout in the trough of the Illinois Combine, has heavily funded Obama's
political career and that of the now-arrested Rod Blagojevich, and in return
they have supported massive sums being paid to Rezko by
These
properties were then allowed to fall into such a state of danger and disrepair,
including sewage running into kitchen sinks, that they were deemed unfit for habitation
by the often black poor that Obama was supposed to be representing as a
Senator. Some buildings were so bad they had to be demolished.
Rezko also
secured appointments for his business associates to state boards and was
eventually indicted for using these connections to demand kickbacks from
businesses that wanted to do business with the state.
Rezko and
Obama toured the $1.6 million mansion in Hyde Park,
Then there
is Obama's close association with the terrorists, William Ayers and his wife
Bernardine Dohrn. In the late sixties Ayers co-founded the terror organisation
called the Weather Underground (also known as the Weathermen and similar
derivatives) and launched a campaign of bombing public places like the Pentagon
and the Capitol Building. Three members were killed making bombs in
In 1970
Ayers was said to have described their philosophy as: 'Kill all the rich people.
Break up their cars and apartments. Bring the revolution home, kill your
parents, that's where it's really at ...' Mr. Ayers himself comes from the home
of 'rich people'.
Bernardine
Dohrn said this about the Charles Manson murders: 'Dig it! Manson killed those
pigs, then they ate dinner in the same room with them, then they shoved a fork
into a victim's stomach.''
The case
against Ayers and Dohrn was thrown out because of then illegal wire-taps and
Ayers is now a professor in the
Ayers recruited Obama to serve as chairman on
the $100 million Chicago Annenberg Challenge and they worked together for seven
years handing out grants to the 'educational' projects of people like ...
William Ayers. They also worked together on another tax-exempt foundation, the
Woods Fund in
Obama's
political career was effectively launched in 1995, just after he was made
chairman of the Annenberg Challenge, at a meeting at the
The Chicago
Annenberg Challenge, run by Obama and Ayers, didn't fund schools directly, but
instead insisted that they affiliate with 'external partners' who were granted
the money. These turned out to be far-left 'community organisers' so beloved of
Bill Ayers and these groups included the Association of Community Organizations
for Reform Now (or Acorn).
Obama also
conducted 'leadership training' seminars with Acorn and its members began to
become heavily involved in his political campaigns. It has also been behind
efforts to 'register voters' (voters most likely to vote for Obama) and Nevada
state officials raided Acorn's Las Vegas office after election authorities
accused the group of submitting multiple voter registrations with fake and
duplicate names.
Among the
major funders of Acorn ... George Soros.
Obama even
refuses to prove that he was born in the
'Mr. Clean'
Obama has a deeply dirty background, but for now no scale of evidence will stop
the swooning Obama zombies from believing the hype or burst their reality
bubble. That is going to take hard experience and it could take some time and a
lot of disappointment before they are released from the clutches of cognitive
dissonance and have to admit to themselves they have been had.
It is the
same for all the black people who voted for what they thought was the first
black president when, in truth, he is a man in a black mask representing the
interests of the white-faced Illuminati cabal, the very families and networks
that ran the slave trade.
I don't want
to be the bringer of bad news or the thwarter of dreams, but honesty demands
it. The man is a trickster controlled by supertricksters. A sock puppet
controlled by bigger sock puppets who serve an even greater and darker evil. To
his masters, Obama is just a means to an end and if it suits them to
assassinate him to trigger civil war and upheaval in the
Oh dear
Oprah, how will you cope when reality dawns? But, then, will it ever??
'What? You
mean you're not the Lord?'
I can
understand the appeal of Obama because people want him to be what he claims to
be, but isn't. They are sick of the conflict, the corruption, the struggle we
call 'life' and they want it all to change. But Obama's change is illusory and
represents only the continued transformation of society in the image envisaged
by Orwell.
We will see
some apparently good things announced, like the closing of
It could
take two years, maybe much more, before cognitive dissonance (lying to
yourself) loses it current grip on the minds of the Obama faithful. Until then
they will make endless excuses for him (lie to themselves) to keep the 'dream'
alive.
But one day
they will have to admit, by the power of the evidence before them, that they
bought a dream and got a nightmare. What a pity they can't see the obvious now
and save them themselves such painful disappointment.
|
|
|
Last
updated 24 December 2009